You said that "The alternatives to animal testing are not reliable", but most of the time is animal testing isn't reliable either.
Many organizations such as PETA fight for increased research into alternative methods of testing so that testing on animals can be alleviated. Since scientists are able to create human tissue and have the actual human gene information I believe there is no point in going back to testing on animals.
The ethicists who endorse this position do not mean that animals are entitled to the very same treatment as humans; arguing that animals should have the right to vote or hold office is clearly absurd. If those tests prove successful then another set of tests are conducted on monkeys. The case of unreliability of experiments could actually make the outcomes of experiments dangerous for human beings if results are over exaggerated and misconstrued.
Quite simply put, the technology needed to take animal testing out of the equation does not yet exist. If we discriminate on grounds of species, we are essentially saying that one species is better than another and that it deserves less consideration than another, but can this really be justified.
In the Name of Science: Under this view, the ways in which experimentation might harm the animal are less morally significant than the potential human benefits from the research.
We have the reliable resources, technology and other dependable methods that will get us further in the discovery of how to cure a lot more diseases and cancers we just need more and more researchers to join in with these more cutting-edge experiments. According to Orlans, the animals suffer from "vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, convulsion, and internal bleeding.
Some philosophers advocate the idea of a moral community. Additionally, well designed studies and appropriate statistical analysis of data can minimize the number of animals required for statistically significant results.
One philosophical position actually accepts those consequences and argues that those humans have the exact same rights or lack of rights as non-human animals. They also argue that tests on animals will yield irrelevant results compared to humans and therefore there is no purpose in animal testing.
As we continue to grapple with mental disorders by prescribing sedatives, does anyone wonder what actually is causing our undoing. Unfortunately, if they did die during the experiments they knew what they died for by trying to save other lives that have the same type of illness they had.
To perform this test, the researchers hook the animals up to tubes that pump huge amounts of the test product into their stomachs until they die.
Animal testing has been a crucial part of science since the beginning. Wouldn't a lifestyle overhaul cause a far bigger and a positive change than animal testing. However, we look upon past examples of this behavior as morally condemnable.
It is imperative that we cherish, nurture, and endeavor to protect all life forms. In today's day and age there is more non-human testing methods being developed.
But in a world full of possibilities and alternatives, these ideals seem well-placed; logical, even. This point of view suggests that more complicated organisms have richer, more fulfilling lives and that it is the richness of the life that actually correlates with moral worth.
In another method, in vitro testing, cellular tests are done inside a test tube. Let us process your essay and you will see only amazing results with us.
Anti Animal Testing Arguments The first and foremost argument that is presented against animal testing deals with the issue of animal cruelty. It is up to us, now, to take a stand and side for what is appropriate. In fact in your last argument you even suggest that animal testing is necessary until future technology is developed, when you said "it's not going to take that long for technology to get upgraded and completely take away animals testing for good.
Thank You for posting such an interesting topic. When appropriate, anesthesia should be used; additionally, studies should have the earliest possible endpoints after which animals who will subsequently experience disease or suffering can be euthanized.
Tipu Aziz, a famous neurosurgeon, explains that over 40, people have been made better as a result of a treatment that had been developed as a result of experimentation on monkeys, leading to the lives of over monkeys severely compromised. There are company's out there that don't need to be using animal testing but are anyway.
Instead of using rats to study cancer on the model uses actual human tissue that will allow the research for cancer to develop a great amount in the years to come. Does this not seem like a futile and pointlessly cruel act.
Also, anyone who handles the animals should be properly trained. Best essay writers You will not find competent and certified essay writers like the ones on our spectacular team. In Against Animal Testing, a pamphlet published by The Body Shop, a well-known cosmetics and bath-product company based in London, the development of products that "use natural ingredients, like bananas and Basil nut oil, as well as others with a long history of safe human usage" is advocated instead of testing on animals 3.
Roughly speaking, this is a group of individuals who all share certain traits in common. Just because a drug was tested on animals doesn't mean more people will be okay with having that same drug tested on them. In fact, some of them the infants will surely meet all of the criteria in the future.
Cohen, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher eds. Aren't there rules, regulations, and laws that govern animal testing? No, there aren't! There is no experiment under the U.S.
Animal Welfare Act that is prohibited, which means that animals can be isolated, starved, electrocuted, poisoned, drugged, and even killed (if it survives this ordeal).
Violation of animal rights is a prominent argument against animal testing. Supporters of this view state that if testing and experimenting on human subjects is unethical or illegal, then treating animals' rights to life any differently is wrong.
I would like to thank my opponent for posting such an interesting debate topic! I accept your debate and your regulations.
Animal testing has become one of the most controversial topics of the modern world; however, there are many aspects of animal testing that people overlook.
The Case Against Animal Experimentation^. An important part of the debate over animal rights centers on the question of the moral status of an animal.
> Arguments against animal testing; Arguments against animal testing. Animal experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective.
Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV. Animal testing essay conclusion. The case for and against animal testing is widely debated and so this makes for a great topic choice for a good animal testing argumentative essay, yet not everything people have said can be sincerely credible so it’s best to way up .Argumentative debate against animal testing