Our suggestion is simply that, instead of trying to find solutions to school shootings in the dubious arms of security technologies, or even solely through more promising public policy, society should ask deeper questions about the nature of education and schooling in American society.
Does the school board have appropriate and adequate policies and procedures governing the carrying and use of firearms by teachers and school staff.
Just imagine being able to attend a live class where you learn about the original intent of the Second Amendment, and the rest of the Constitution, while also getting world class training on how to defend yourself and your family with a handgun.
Many handguns, including popular models used by police departments, can fire when dropped or bumped. Will the school district build and operate its own firearms range. How hard would it be to train teachers in a situation like that to be able to deal with these things.
And that one thousand dollar course registration, again, completely waived for the first WallBuilders Live listeners to register.
How to handle that, how to deal with it. He also supports properly organized and operated school police departments, which are in-house school district police officers that are trained, commissioned, and certified professional peace officers in school districts where state law allows districts to have such departments.
Sofia Hidalgo, 15, of Glenmont, Md. So, your scenarios, and where people are moving, and all that, is almost the same. To answer this question, we need to get to the heart of how students experience school and the meaning that schools have in American life.
It is time to think about school shootings not as a problem of security, but also as a problem of education. Great to be here. We need to be restricting the sales of guns, not increasing them. If the school allows staff to carry their personal weapons for the purpose of protecting staff and students, what responsibilities do school boards and administrators thereby assume for making sure the firearms carried are functional.
He says one reason the district decided to allow armed teachers was because the area does not have its own police department.
I look forward to seeing you on the range April 13th. How concerned should we be. What to do Of course, it will be difficult to definitively answer the questions we have posed above. You get some teachers that are interested in this and go through whatever legal requirements are necessary in a given area to facilitate this.
By tasking those employees with those responsibilities, Trump notes, the school district is also accepting responsibility and potential liability for implementation of such policies. And this is what we wish the president would do - and others in positions of power would do, and that is listen to our students.
Since schools are experienced as places of force and control, for some students, they also come to be seen as appropriate places for violence. Who on school staff is qualified to provide such training, operate a firearms range, etc. In addition, highly trained police officers, whose only job is law enforcement, all too often fail to use firearms successfully: A year-old gunman killed 17 students and teachers at Stoneman Douglas High School.
For example, if the school district is concerned about first responder response time from the community to the school, has the school district considered employing a school resource officer SRO or its own trained, commissioned and certified school police officer who is a school district employee, such as what is allowed in Texas, Florida and other states.
So, there is no material change in the amount of guns that people have access to. Since the shooting, Trump has also suggested he may support some new measures to limit guns. There is also sometimes a rage, however, against the day-to-day imposition of school discipline and punishment. An example of this is the manifesto left by Luke Woodham, who shot two students in Implementation Issues Present School Boards and Administrators with Significant Responsibility and Potential Liability School safety expert advises against arming teachers and school staff Arming persons at schools should be left to professional school public safety officials: This is the kind of thing we do all the time in the SEAL teams.
E Is Arming Teachers The Answer To School Shootings We discuss whether or not arming teachers with guns is the best answer to stopping school shootings.
The question is more complex than it appears. In fact, he may be exactly the kind of person that President Donald Trump and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos have in mind when they talk about arming a select number of teachers as one of their main responses to the Parkland, Fla., school massacre last month.
The arguments against arming teachers are multiple. The gun, by definition, would potentially be available to every student, teacher, and school visitor. Moreover, those contemplating armed attacks on schools would know that a gun is available and could act accordingly.
Trump advises school districts against allowing teachers and school staff to be armed. Trump says that while gun control and gun rights advocates typically seize on school proposals to arm teachers to further political agendas, his opposition to arming teachers and school staff focuses solely on implementation issues, not political statements and beliefs about rights to bear arms.
Feb 25, · The Guardian: Trump Insists On Arming Teachers Despite Lack Of Evidence That It Would Stop Shootings -- "Facing opposition from the country’s largest teachers’ unions, school security guards.
ARM TEACHERS? THE FACTS ARGUE AGAINST IT Recent school shootings have prompted renewed debate regarding the idea of arming teachers or other school personnel to fend off attacks by armed intruders or even students.
Similar arguments were put Colorado. The arguments against arming teachers are multiple. The .An argument against arming teachers to stop school shootings